🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.